The article discusses the current state of the container orchestration market and the challenges faced by Kubernetes, specifically in terms of its complexity and lack of support for some features. The author suggests that Mesosphere’s Marathon is a better alternative to Kubernetes due to its simplicity and support for all features. Additionally, the author mentions that HashiCorp’s Nomad is another open-source project that supports Kubernetes but lacks support from major companies. The article concludes by mentioning that Pivotal and VMware have announced a new product called PKS, which combines Docker with Kubernetes and some VMware products, as an alternative to the current market offerings.

The author’s opinion is clear in the article, as they suggest that Marathon is a better alternative to Kubernetes due to its simplicity and feature support. However, the author also mentions other open-source projects like Nomad and PKS, which could be considered as alternatives to Kubernetes depending on the user’s needs and preferences.

The article does not provide any specific data or statistics to support the author’s claims, but rather relies on their personal experience and knowledge of the container orchestration market. However, the author does mention that Pivotal and VMware have announced a new product called PKS, which could be considered as a more established alternative to Kubernetes.

Overall, the article provides a subjective analysis of the container orchestration market and the challenges faced by Kubernetes, and suggests alternative solutions such as Marathon and PKS. However, the lack of objective data or statistics in the article limits its authority and reliability.